eplkak.blogg.se

military has combined the necessary components from Clausewitz and 20 th Century insurgency pundits to formulate encompassing doctrine.Įnds (victory), ways (tactics), and means (resources) buttress the strategy of traditional and insurgent warfare. military doctrine to offer multifaceted avenues to plan for and conduct operations within the irregular warfare paradigm.

Aspects from these writings found their way into U.S. Since Mao Zedong’s Protracted War, various authors and military practitioners examined and identified the vital tenets to sustain or defeat an insurgency. Politics may play a part in an insurgency, but politics is a single attribute of an insurgency’s overall effort. Although Clausewitz’s classical notion of war as the continuation of policy by other means underpins most US military doctrine, Clausewitz’s postulations do not always eloquently apply to insurgencies. Warfare is not a monolithic concept, and conventional and insurgent conflicts hold similar and differing underlying principles. The ever-changing character of conventional war and insurgencies puts an emphasis on the need for the military to utilize and continuously adapt operational art and refine doctrine to defeat the morphing enemy. However, the military should not solely concentrate on conventional aspects of warfare and leave the publications from the past two decades “on the shelf” to become obsolete. military doctrine retains the essential elements to plan and execute successful operations against conventional and irregular opponents. Department of Defense (DoD) shifted the military’s focus to strategic competition, the armed forces should not forget the lessons the services learned from its counterinsurgency missions during the Global War on Terrorism (GWOT). will more likely perform actions against irregular forces vice large-scale combat operations, denoting the necessity for the services to maintain fundamental knowledge of counterinsurgency tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs).

United States (US) military history indicates the U.S. Preparing For Future Conflicts: Refining Conventional and Counterinsurgency Doctrine